Implementation

When the final judgments are entered, the plaintiffs do not usually try under the doctrine of res judicata, the same or a similar claim again against the defendant or relitigating issues, and even different legal claims or theories bring. This prevents a new trial the same thing with a different result, or if the plaintiff wins, a second attempt that only multiplies the court against the accused.

If the Court finds for the plaintiff, the respondent must be the law on pain of court, which usually correspond to a cash prize. If the defendant does not pay, the court various powers to seize property of the defendant is located within their jurisdiction, such as:

  • The implementation of the writ
  • Bank account garnishment
  • Pledges
  • Wage garnishment

If all assets are located elsewhere, the applicant must seek second suit before the competent court of judicial enforcement of such previous conviction. This can be a difficult task if you are prone on the court in one state or nation to another cross, although the courts to respect each other to do so if it were otherwise no clear statutory provision. The accused, who has not owned any jurisdiction said to be "judgment-proof." The concept is to describe in general colloquial term for indigent defendants.

Poor decision-resistant respondents are no longer in prison, the debtor's prisons, by law, the constitutional amendment, or of international human rights treaties in the vast majority of the common law jurisdictions prohibited.
lawsuit settlements watch grimm online lawsuit settlement